Taking the train is a great way to see the country. It's certainly a break from looking down at America from 30,000 feet. And if you've got the time it is a leisurely way to travel. But it may not be what you expect. Amtrak is short of funds and it shows. Here's what you need to know before you buy that ticket.
Traveling by train is a throwback to an earlier age of travel when the major
railroad companies such as Union Pacific, Santa Fe,
Burlington & Northern, etc. proudly ran their crack streamliners. And
trains such as The City of Los Angeles, the Super Chief, and the El
Capitan crisscrossed the country. That was when the railroads
handled both passenger and freight. As more and more demands were put on the
rail system Congress felt it would be better if a passenger-only system was
created and in 1971 Amtrak, a hybrid private company, (funded by the
government) was formed. The railroads stuck to freight and Amtrak focused on
the passenger-hauling business. Well, it wasn’t long before it dawned on
Congress that a slight misstep had taken place. The major railroad companies
owned the rails. And that’s the “rub,” as they say.
How this “rail ownership” affected passenger trains is illustrated by the
following example. One of the more popular routes was Los
Angeles to Las Vegas,
and points beyond. With the lure of gambling, girls and shows, weekend travel
in particular was tremendous. Freeways were jammed, flights were sold out and
the train was crowded. Then, about 15 years ago, the trains stopped. The reason
was that freight traffic on that route was so heavy it could no longer handle
passenger service. What should have happened with the advent of Amtrak was the
creation of a huge track-laying program so Amtrak could operate independently.
Well it didn’t happen then it surely won’t happen now with construction and material
cost soaring.